Prince Albert Victor
Prince Albert Victor Christian Edward (known as "Eddy" to his friends) is one of the most famous suspects
in the Jack the Ripper case, figuring in no less than three major theories. Over the years, different versions of his personality,
mental stability, and manner of death have appeared.
Eddy was born in 1864 to Prince Albert Edward (known as "Bertie"and son to Queen Victoria --Bertie would
later become King Edward VII) and Princess Alexandra. Bertie was well known by the English public and not highly respected
by many of the lower, and some of the upper, classes. He had a reputation for being a 'ladies man' and was rumored to have
been a party to many a scandal that was hushed up by the Palace. Princess Alexandra, on the other hand, was an equivalent
to today's Princess Di in that she was much loved by the public who had great sympathy for her having to put up with the antics
of her husband.
By most reports, Eddy was a "slow" child and grew up to be a rather dull adult. "Even his nearest and dearest,
who were naturally bent on making the best of poor Prince Eddy, could not bring themselves to use more positive terms. Prince
Eddy was certainly dear and good, kind and considerate. He was also backward and utterly listless. He was self-indulgent and
not punctual. He had been given no proper education, and as a result he was interested in nothing. He was as heedless and
as aimless as a gleaming gold-fish in a crystal bowl." (James Pope-Hennessy, Queen Mary. Quoted in Rumbelow, p. 194.)
There were unconfirmed rumors that Eddy was mildly retarded. That his intelligence was lower than expected
of a future monarch is not disputed and it is believed that this limited mental ability was one of the reasons why he required
a tutor at Cambridge. He was partially deaf, owing to inherited hearing problems through his mother's side of the family.
He had an unusually long and thin neck which required him to wear long starched collars and led to him receiving the nickname,
"collars & cuffs".
Eddy was named Duke of Clarence and Avondale in 1891 and would likely have followed Bertie to the throne
had Eddy not fallen victim to the influenza epidemic of 1891-92. The death was especially ironic as Eddy had become engaged
to Princess May of Teck (eventually to become Queen Mary) in December of 1891. During Eddy's lifetime, there were rumors regarding
his lifestyle, intelligence, and physical health but nothing was ever proven.
During the time of the Ripper murders, there were no actual theories presented linking Eddy to the crimes.
Those would come much later after many of the principal characters in the theories were dead. It would not be until 1962 when
the first theory regarding Eddy's involvement in the murders became known. According to Jack the Ripper: A to Z (Begg,
Fido, and Skinner), the first allegation comes from Phillippe Jullien in his book, Edouard VII. In it, Jullien remarks
that "the prince and 'the Duke of Bedford'" (A-Z, pg. 16) were rumored to be responsible for the murders. I cannot
find any details on this mysterious "Duke of Bedford" to corroborate this remark.
This thread was taken up by Dr. Thomas Stowell who, in 1970, published an article in The Criminologist
called "A Solution". It created a sensation by his veiled accusation of Prince Eddy as the killer. Stowell apparently used
the private papers of Sir William Gull as his primary source material and it was these papers which led him to devise his
theory. Throughout his article, the killer is referred to as "S", but there is enough internal evidence to identify Eddy as
his chief culprit.
According to Stowell, Eddy was suffering from syphilis, contracted during a shore party in the West Indies,
and that this infection drove Eddy insane and compelled him to commit the murders. In this theory, the Royal Family knew that
Eddy was the murderer "definitely ... after the second murder, and possibly even after the first" (Rumbelow, p 196). Eddy's
doctor in this matter was supposedly Sir William Gull who informed Bertie that his son was dying of syphilitic infection.
Apparently no attempt was made to restrain Eddy until after the Double Event when he was bundled away in restraints to a private
mental hospital. Eddy then escaped to carry out the Kelly murder after which he was again locked away and died, not of flu
in 1892 as claimed, but of "softening of the brain" in a private mental hospital in Sandringham. Stowell goes on to include
Eddy's resemblance to Druitt and the eye-witness accounts of the Ripper as proof positive. While a neat and tidy theory, later
Ripperologists have poked several effective holes through it.
To begin with, Stowell claims of using Gull's private papers cannot be substantiated due to Stowell's death
within days of publishing his theory and the burning of his own papers (unread) by the family. With the lack of the papers,
Stowell's claims of Eddy being homosexual (and nearly escaping prosecution in the Cleveland Street scandal) and of Eddy's
contracting syphilis cannot be confirmed. Adding more confusion, Stowell used Gull's papers for his theory but Eddy supposedly
died in 1892 and Gull in 1890 so Gull could not have been able to comment on the cause of Eddy's death. If the theory is true,
Gull could be a source of confirming the infection but not necessarily of it being the cause of Eddy's death. Being the two
most important parts of the theory, their elimination severely weakens the case.
More importantly, examination of court and Royal records reveal that Eddy was not even in London on the important
"29 August-7 September 1888: The Prince was staying with Viscount Downe at Danby Lodge, Grosmont, Yorkshire.
(Nichols murdered 31 August.)
"7-10 September 1888: The Prince was at the Cavalry Barracks in York. (Chapman murdered 8 September.)
"27-30 September: The Prince was at Abergeldie, Scotland, where Queen Victoria recorded in her journal that
he lunched with her on 30 September. (Stride and Eddowes murdered between 1.00 and 2.00 a.m., 30 September.)
"1 November: Arrived in London from York.
"2-12 November: The Prince was at Sandringham. (Kelly murdered 9 November)" (A-Z, p. 17.)
Stowell argues that the Ripper's skill at dissection was obtained through Eddy's experience at "dressing
deer". A far leap in logic. Despite the implausibility of Eddy actually being the Ripper, he was named as the infamous killer
in yet another book: Prince Jack by Frank Spiering.
This strange book takes the basic thrust of Stowell's theory, clearly naming Eddy as the killer, and goes
even further. Spiering claims to have found a copy of Gull's notes in The New York Academy of Medicine in which, supposedly,
was a report of Gull hypnotizing Eddy and watching horrified as Eddy acted out the murders. From this, Gull went on to diagnose
Eddy as having syphilis and that the accompanying pain was driving the Prince out to commit the murders in fits of fantastic
rage. Spiering goes on to suggest that Lord Salisbury, in possibly collusion with Bertie, had Eddy killed by a morphine overdose.
Rumbelow states that the book was called "Grade Z fiction" by the American reviewer, Dale L. Walker and that
Spiering's own response to the criticism was to claim that the papers also included Eddy's confession to Gull which was not
mentioned in the book. Following this claim, both Walker and Rumbelow attempted to trace the existence of these Gull documents
but were informed by The New York Academy of Medicine that "'None of the entries in our catalog for works by or about Sir
William Gull contain the material referred to by Mr. Spiering." The response to Rumbelow's request mentions that it is not
inconceivable that the material could have been misplaced "but it is highly unlikely". Rumbelow goes on to show that Spiering's
research was sloppy at best and therefore discredits much of the theory.
In 1978, Spiering issued a challenge to Queen Elizabeth II to reveal the truth about Eddy. Either she should
open the Royal archives or hold a press release detailing the Duke's activities as the Ripper. When a Buckingham Palace spokesman
stated that Spiering could examine the Royal Archives (as other researchers had done) but that the accusation were "not sufficiently
serious to warrant a special statement from the Queen", Spiering replied that he didn't want to see the files. Leaving Rumbelow
and others to deduce that the entire episode had been orchestrated to sell copies of the book.
Since then Spiering has not made any further claims or produced any further evidence supporting his theory.
Having survived accusation as the Ripper, Eddy now moved into the role of supporting player to the murderer
(or murderers) in two separate theories. The first involved his old Cambridge tutor, James K. Stephen and was initially made
in Michael Harrison's biography of Eddy, Clarence. According to this theory, Harrison had gone over Stowell's article
and come to the conclusion that "S" was not Eddy, but actually Stephens who was committing the murders "out of a twisted desire
for revenge" because of the dissolution of a homosexual relationship with Eddy.
James Stephen was the son of infamous Maybrick judge, Sir James Fitzjames Stephen, and cousin of Vanessa
Bell and Virginia Woolf. In 1883, James became Eddy's tutor at Cambridge where his mission was to try and bring Eddy's intelligence
up to acceptable levels. Eddy's mind was, according to one former tutor, "abnormally dormant". During this period, Harrison
claims, a sexual relationship began between the tutor and pupil, resulting in a scandal of which, apparently, little evidence
remains. "The accusation seems chiefly to be based on Harrison's interpretation of the old rugby song, 'They Called the Bastard
Stephen,' which he thinks refers to Stephen and Clarence!" (Rumbelow, p 198)
The relationship supposedly ended when Eddy was gazetted to the 10th Hussars on June 17th, 1885. There appears
to be no further incident until two years later when Stephen had a mysterious, and eventually fatal, accident. Separate descriptions
of the accident exist. Virginia Woolf's biographer, Quentin Bell, says that the family tradition was that Stephen was struck
in the head by some object from a moving train. Harrison claims that Stephen was injured when a horse he was riding shied
and backed him into the moving vane of a windmill. Whatever the case, the accident was a major one and required a great deal
of care. Although he originally appeared to have made a complete recovery, it was later discovered that his brain had been
permanently damaged and Stephen was slowly going mad.
Stephen's behavior was quite unusual. Bell relates incidents of Stephen plunging the blade from a sword stick
into bread, becoming deluged that he was a painter of great genius, rushing about insanely in a hansom, and "'on another occasion
he appeared at breakfast and announced, as though it were an amusing incident, that the doctors had told him that he would
either die or go completely mad.'" (Rumbelow, p 199)
At this point, Stephen becomes a patient of Sir William Gull (Rumbelow places it after Gull's first stroke
in 1887) and begins a rapid mental and physical decline. Stephen drifts from one project to the next with little focus or
interest. It is during this period that Stephen writes two volumes of poetry that include extremely violent images against
women. Stephen was committed to a mental hospital in 1891, where he died the following February.
Harrison contends that the breakup of the relationship with Eddy, combined with the accident, provoked Stephen
to try and avenge himself upon Eddy. Why he would pick such pitiful women is not sufficiently answered. Harrison argues that
the murders are a kind of blood sacrifice through an elaborate explanation that includes a savage deity named the Great Mother,
the Roman God Terminus, the relation of Frances Coles name translated into Greek, and Stephen's pamphlet in defense of the
compulsory study of Greek at the universities. Harrison goes on to state that the Ripper in fact murdered ten women (to fit
into his theory he included Alice Mackenzie, Frances Coles, Mellett or Davis and Annie Farmer) but Rumbelow disputes this
counting as Stride and Eddowes are counted as one and Annie Farmer was not murdered at all. The ten women theory was important
because Harrison believed that Stephen was acting out his own poem "Air: Kaphoozelum" in which the song's villain kills ten
Harrison tries again when he attempts to connect Stephen's handwriting with the Ripper letters "From Hell"
and "Dear Boss" and that the internal style of some of Stephen's poems matches some of the anonymous Ripper letters. This
connection was rebutted by Thomas J. Mann in an article in the Journal of the World Association of Document Examiners (June
1975) in which Mann determines that only the Lusk letter is likely to be genuine and that the connection between Stephen's
handwriting and that letter was minimal. "The overwhelming evidence is that the two do not match; and if the author of the
Lusk letter was indeed Jack the Ripper, then J.K. Stephen was not that man." (Rumbelow, p. 204)
Not to be outdone, the Eddy/Stephen theory resurfaced in David Abrahamsen's book, Murder and Madness,
The Secret Life of Jack the Ripper. Abrahamsen was a forensic psychiatrist who developed a psychological profile of Jack
based upon the murders and what little evidence was left behind. His conclusion that the murderer was insane and that the
murders were sexual in motive was not anything new even though he did give some new interpretations of some of the evidence
and method. Where Abrahamsen fails is that he then takes the profile and goes looking for someone to match it! Stephen is
the only logical choice because he is the only one of the KNOWN suspects who matches the profile. This ignores the fact that
the Ripper could still be someone unknown to us at this time. Even more, Abrahamsen claims that Eddy was an accomplice in
the crimes and that he and Stephen enjoyed a mutually dependent relationship with Stephen being the dominant partner. As the
theory is based virtually completely on psychological conclusions, the lack, or contradicting nature, of some remaining evidence.
Eddy is unlikely to have been the source of Stephen's lovesick murder madness, but Eddy returns in what is
the most popular theory to date.
The Royal Conspiracy theory first appeared in 1973 in the BBC programme, Jack the Ripper. In it, fictional
detectives Barlow and Watt finally solve the Ripper mystery through a series of conspiracies and cover-ups. The story goes
that the producers of the program, in doing research, were told to contact a man named Sickert who knew about a secret marriage
between Eddy and a poor Catholic girl named Alice Mary Crook. Sickert painted a strange story involving Eddy, Lord Salisbury,
Sir Robert Anderson, Sir William Gull, and even Queen Victoria herself!
The man, Joseph Sickert, was the son of famous painter, Walter Sickert, from whom he reportedly got the story.
Sickert had lived in the East End during the time of the murders and was supposedly a close friend of the Royal family. Princess
Alex asked Sickert to take Eddy under his wing and watch out for him. Sickert eventually introduced Eddy to a poor girl named
Annie Crook who worked in one of the local shops in Cleveland Street. Eddy soon got the girl pregnant and they were living
quite happily with their daughter Alice until the Queen discovered her grandson's indiscretion and demanded that the situation
be terminated. Not only was Annie a commoner, but a Catholic as well and there was belief that news of a Catholic heir to
the throne would spark a revolution. The Queen gave the matter to her Prime Minister, Lord Salisbury, to solve and he, in
turn, went to Sir William Gull. After a daring raid on the Cleveland Street love nest, Eddy was taken away and Annie was sent
to one of Gull's hospitals where Gull performed experiments on her designed to erase her memory and drive her insane. Their
child, however, escaped the raid unharmed with her nanny, Mary Kelly.
Kelly had been a coworker of Annie's, as well as a model for Sickert, and she became the child's nanny soon
after its birth. Knowing that the game was up, Kelly hid Alice with nuns and fled into the East End. Eventually, she told
the story to several of her cronies (Nichols, Stride and Chapman) and they decided to blackmail the government when they needed
money to pay local protection thugs. When Salisbury learned of the threat, he called on Gull again
This time, Gull devised an elaborate scheme to silence the women based on Masonic rituals. Enlisting the
help of John Netley, a coachman, he created Jack the Ripper as a symbol of Freemasonry. Sir Robert Anderson was enlisted to
help cover up the crimes and act as lookout during the murders. The murders would be silent messages about the power and strength
of Masonry and the fate awaiting any who opposed them.
Eddowes, Sickert said, was a mistake. She often went by the name of Mary Kelly and it was a case of mistaken
identity. Once the truth was known, the real Mary Kelly was found and silenced. The conspiracy closed in upon itself and chose
M.J. Druitt as a scapegoat to take the blame and, Sickert hinted, Druitt was murdered for it. The girl, Alice, grew up and
later, by an odd series of twists and turns, married Walter Sickert and gave birth to Joseph.
The program caused a sensation and lead directly to the publication of Stephen Knight's controversial book
Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution in 1978. In it, Knight tries to prove that the conspiracy not only existed but that the third man in the murder triad
was not Sir Robert Anderson, but Walter Sickert himself!
The Knight theory, though interesting and entertaining in its own way, has been effectively debunked by many
Ripperologists. Most notable was Rumbelow's refutation in his revised edition of Jack the Ripper: The Complete Casebook
where Rumbelow provides evidence that Annie lived longer than Knight claims, spent time after 1888 in workhouses, and had
Alice with her through some of this time. There are no marriage or birth records listing Eddy as Annie's husband or as Alice's
father. Aside from rumor or secondhand statements, there was never any hard evidence linking Eddy to Cleveland Street, Annie
Crook, or even Walter Sickert. The lack of evidence, conspiracy theorists purport, proves the theory because all evidence
was destroyed! Regardless of the legitimate criticisms, the Royal Conspiracy remains one of the most popular theories with
several movies, novels, and graphic novels built around it.
In the end, it is difficult to consider Eddy a serious suspect. Although rumored, there is no concrete evidence
that Eddy had mental problems (either through syphilis or any other reason), he is reported being out of the country during
the murders, and no solid evidence has been produced that links Eddy to sexual relationships with either James Stephen or
Annie Crook. Despite these facts, it appears likely that (outside of serious Ripper circles) the theory of Eddy's involvement
in the murders in some way will never completely fade.